• <menu id="gyogu"></menu><menu id="gyogu"><strong id="gyogu"></strong></menu>
    <dd id="gyogu"></dd>
    <menu id="gyogu"><strong id="gyogu"></strong></menu>
  • Skip to content

    Publishing metrics

    The range of models used to measure the impact of journals and articles is constantly increasing, though most are based on the level of citations. As a signatory to DORA, the Royal Society offers a variety of journal and article-based metrics.

    Impact factor

    The impact factor is a measure of how often an average article in a journal has been cited. It is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to source items published in that journal during the previous 2 years.

    While the impact factor is a relatively easy measure to calculate and understand, it does have some limitations. Given the highly skewed nature of the citation distribution of a journal's articles, the appropriateness of using a mean has been questioned. Also, most journals contain a significant proportion of articles that are never cited. Such articles can be seen as ‘benefiting’ unfairly from the impact factor of the journal in which they appear.

    Journal 2018 Impact Factor Rank 5 Year Impact Factor Cited Half-Life Immediacy Index
    Proceedings A 2.818 23rd out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’ 2.749 >10 0.509
    Proceedings B 4.304 11th out of 87 in ‘Biology’ 5.386 9.7 0.839
    Philosophical Transactions A 3.093 18th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’ 3.421 9.0 1.953
    Philosophical Transactions B 6.139 7th out of 87 in ‘Biology’ 7.205 9.0 3.003
    Interface 3.224 16th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’ 4.307 6.0 0.821
    Biology Letters 3.323 17th out of 87 in ‘Biology’ 3.484 7.0 0.517
    Interface Focus 3.092 18th out of 87 in ‘Biology’ 3.333 4.7 1.877
    Open Biology 3.890 92nd out of 298 in ‘Biochemistry and Molecular Biology’ 4.124 3.2 0.635
    Royal Society Open Science 2.515 26th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’ 2.693 2.2 0.423
    • 5 year impact factor: is the impact factor calculated using a base of 5 years’ worth of cited articles, rather than 2. This gives a fairer picture of journals in fields with slower citation patterns, such as mathematics.
    • Cited half-life: the number of years, counting back from the current year, which account for half the total citations received by the cited journal in the current year. This provides a measure of how ‘long-lived’ the articles are in terms of their influence on the literature.
    • Immediacy index: the average number of times that an article is cited in the same year it is published. It gives an indication of how topical the material in the journal is.

    Eigenfactor

    The Eigenfactor gives an indication of the overall contribution of the journal, as a whole, to the literature.

    It does this using an algorithm similar to that of Google's ‘PageRank’ to count citations into and out of the journal and to weight them according to the ranking of the source or destination. It uses the Thomson Reuters journal dataset and it is intended to measure how likely a journal is to be used or the amount of time a reader will spend reading it. Large journals rank more highly in the Eigenfactor system than small journals (in contrast to the impact factor, which is independent of size).

    Journal 2018 Eigenfactor Eigenfactor Rank Article Influence Article Influence Rank
    Proceedings A 0.01894 13th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’ 1.114 16th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
    Proceedings B 0.07966 2nd out of 87 in ‘Biology’ 2.102 9th out of 87 in ‘Biology’
    Philosophical Transactions A 0.02820 11th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’ 1.368 13th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
    Philosophical Transactions B 0.07107 3rd out of 87 in ‘Biology’ 2.952 6th out of 87 in ‘Biology’
    Interface 0.02919 10th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’ 1.514 12th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
    Biology Letters 0.01953 8th out of 87 in ‘Biology’ 1.339 16th out of 87 in ‘Biology’
    Interface Focus 0.00485 24th out of 87 in 'Biology' 1.103 19th out of 87 in ‘Biology’
    Open Biology 0.01015 103rd out of 298 in ‘Biochemistry and Molecular Biology’ 1.646 54th out of 298 in ‘Biochemistry and Molecular Biology’
    Royal Society Open Science 0.01715 14th out of 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’ 0.950 18th out 69 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
    • Article influence: measures the relative importance of the journal on a per-article basis. It is the journal's Eigenfactor Score divided by the fraction of articles published by the journal. That fraction is normalised so that the sum total of articles from all journals is 1. The mean Article Influence Score is 1.00. A score greater than 1.00 indicates that each article in the journal has above-average influence. A score less than 1.00 indicates that each article in the journal has below-average influence.

    Altmetrics

    Altmetrics are non-traditional metrics proposed as an alternative to citation impact metrics.

    We use a partner organisation called Altmetric to track and display the online activity around an article. Altmetric track social media sites, newspapers and magazines for mentions of each published article. The aim is to help authors quantify the attention their article is receiving and to help readers establish the articles their peers think are interesting.

    The Altmetric ‘doughnut’ can be found on the ‘Details’ tab of each article.

    Was this page useful?
    Thank you for your feedback
    Thank you for your feedback. Please help us improve this page by taking our short survey.
    香港精选免费资料大全